The artificial intelligence boom has been led by Silicon Valley, but the next phase of value creation may be decided by physical bottlenecks. Every model, chatbot and productivity tool depends on a vast physical network of chips, memory, servers, power systems and cooling equipment. Many of the companies that control these scarce inputs are based in emerging markets, creating a different way to access AI growth: not by chasing the most visible applications, but by identifying the infrastructure champions that allow AI to scale.
Many of the most critical components of AI infrastructure are produced by a small and increasingly consolidated group of highly specialized companies. A significant share of that expertise sits in Taiwan and South Korea. Taiwan is central to the advanced chips and servers that power AI systems, while South Korea supplies the high-performance memory needed to process vast amounts of data quickly. Other specialist manufacturers help bring these parts together so they can be used by the large cloud computing companies. As AI systems become bigger and more powerful, they also need more electricity, better cooling and faster connections between all the different pieces of hardware.
This means that while much of the spending originates with U.S. cloud platforms that need more data centers and computing power, a meaningful share of the economics can accrue to EM companies. In other words, industry profits are not confined to the companies building the applications; they can also sit with the infrastructure champions that make those applications possible.
The investment case is strengthened by industry structure. Many parts of the semiconductor and hardware supply chain have consolidated dramatically over the past decade. That consolidation gives the strongest companies better pricing power, stronger returns on capital and a larger share of the value created by the AI infrastructure cycle. For investors, the opportunity is not simply to buy AI growth, but to identify where scarcity, scale and consolidation allow that growth to translate into attractive economics.
Exhibit 1: EM Tech Earnings Growth Moderating Valuations

Source: FactSet as of 30 June 2026.
This opportunity is not without risk. Technology cycles can be volatile, capital requirements are significant and geopolitical tensions remain an important consideration. This is where active management becomes critical: continuously assessing AI developments around the world and understanding how they may affect individual portfolio holdings.
The recent volatility in semiconductor stocks appears disconnected from any material change in long-term fundamentals. While investors may be reassessing expectations and risk appetite, share prices can often react more sharply than the underlying outlook would suggest in the short term. Over longer periods, however, investment returns are ultimately driven by a company’s ability to execute, grow earnings and deliver on its fundamentals.
China deserves its own place in this discussion because its AI ecosystem is developing differently and should therefore be viewed through a different lens. U.S. restrictions on access to the most advanced chips and semiconductor manufacturing tools have made the path more difficult. But rather than stopping China’s AI ambitions, those constraints have reinforced the strategic importance of building a more domestic technology stack.
China is now building a more self-contained AI supply chain that spans domestic chips, servers, cloud platforms, models and applications. Its technology is not directly comparable with the leading global ecosystem at the individual chip level, but China is reconfiguring the problem. Where access to the most advanced hardware is constrained, it can still pursue scale, local optimization, cheaper deployment models and tighter hardware-software integration.
For investors, the China story is therefore not simply about catch-up. It is about the emergence of a separate AI ecosystem shaped by constraint, policy support, local demand and cost advantage. China may not win by matching the frontier chip-for-chip; it may succeed by optimizing around constraint through scale, cost discipline and hardware-software integration.
In the AI era, emerging markets are not peripheral; they are central to the infrastructure that makes AI possible. While Silicon Valley may capture the headlines, some of the most compelling opportunities may lie with the emerging market companies that supply the infrastructure behind AI. The next phase of AI investing may be less about who builds the most visible applications, and more about who controls the scarce capacity that allows those applications to scale.
Finding Value Beyond the AI Rally
A strong global equity rebound masked uneven leadership, creating opportunities in companies tied to energy security, grid modernization and industrial capex.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Copyright © 2026 ClearBridge Investments. ClearBridge Investment Management Limited ("CIML") is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and is registered as an Investment Advisor with the Securities and Exchange Commission. CIML is operationally integrated under the ClearBridge Investments” global brand, alongside ClearBridge Investments, LLC (“CBI”), and other ClearBridge entities indirectly, wholly owned by Franklin Resources, Inc. All opinions and data included in this commentary are as of the publication date and are subject to change. The opinions and views expressed herein are of the author and may differ from other portfolio managers or the firm as a whole, and are not intended to be a forecast of future events, a guarantee of future results or investment advice. This information should not be used as the sole basis to make any investment decision. The statistics have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but the accuracy and completeness of this information cannot be guaranteed.
Neither ClearBridge Investments, LLC, nor CIML , nor its information providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information. Performance source: Internal. Benchmark source: Morgan Stanley Capital International. Neither ClearBridge Investments, LLC nor its information providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information. Performance is preliminary and subject to change. Neither MSCI nor any other party involved in or related to compiling, computing or creating the MSCI data makes any express or implied warranties or representations with respect to such data (or the results to be obtained by the use thereof), and all such parties hereby expressly disclaim all warranties of originality, accuracy, completeness, merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose with respect to any of such data. Without limiting any of the foregoing, in no event shall MSCI, any of its affiliates or any third party involved in or related to compiling, computing or creating the data have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, punitive, consequential or any other damages (including lost profits) even if notified of the possibility of such damages. No further distribution or dissemination of the MSCI data is permitted without MSCI’s express written consent. Further distribution is prohibited.